During an assessment with limited English proficiency, is it appropriate to use a child as translator?

Prepare for the LPCC Law and Ethics Test 2. Use flashcards and multiple-choice questions with explanations. Enhance your understanding of ethics and legal standards for effective counseling practice.

When language access is needed, the key is accurate, confidential communication and appropriate professional boundaries. A child should not translate during an assessment with limited English proficiency because a minor translator may lack training in psychological terminology and in preserving confidentiality, and their participation can introduce inaccuracies and bias. The power dynamics and potential emotional burden on the child, plus the risk of misunderstandings or incomplete translation of sensitive content, make this an unethical and unsafe practice. The counselor should instead arrange a qualified interpreter or interpreter services, ensuring confidentiality and accurate communication. If no interpreter is available, the assessment should be postponed or alternative language resources should be sought rather than using a child as translator.